How to make strategic trade-offs and say no to good opportunities
Develop discipline to decline opportunities that don't serve core strategy, even when they're attractive.
Your Progress
0 of 6 steps completedStep-by-Step Instructions
1 Step 1: Define your strategic focus and non-negotiables
Step 1: Define your strategic focus and non-negotiables
Can't say no without knowing what you're saying yes to. Clarify: core market/customer, primary value proposition, critical capabilities, revenue model. Example: "We serve mid-market B2B SaaS with product-led growth, not enterprise with sales-led." Clear focus creates filter for opportunities. Without focus, every opportunity looks good. Strategy is as much about what you won't do as what you will.
2 Step 2: Establish decision criteria for evaluating opportunities
Step 2: Establish decision criteria for evaluating opportunities
Create scorecard for opportunities: strategic fit, resource requirements, expected ROI, timing/urgency, risk level. Weight criteria based on priorities. Objective framework removes emotion from decisions. Prevents: shiny object syndrome, political decision-making, inconsistent choices. When opportunity arises, run through framework. Numbers don't lie; enthusiasm does. Systematic evaluation beats gut feel.
3 Step 3: Calculate true cost including opportunity cost
Step 3: Calculate true cost including opportunity cost
Saying yes to one thing means saying no to something else. Opportunity cost is real cost. Analyze: team time required, leadership attention needed, what existing priorities get delayed. Every yes is implicit no to alternatives. Question: "If we do this, what won't we do?" Resources are finite. Treating them as infinite leads to overcommitment and under-delivery. Count complete costs.
Hell Yeah or No by Derek Sivers
Short book on decision-making and saying no to distractions
4 Step 4: Practice saying no politely but firmly
Step 4: Practice saying no politely but firmly
Saying no doesn't require being rude. Acknowledge opportunity's merits, explain why it doesn't fit current strategy, suggest alternatives if appropriate. Example: "This is interesting, but we're focused exclusively on X market this year. Let's revisit in six months." Clear no is kinder than ambiguous maybe. Clarity enables other party to move on. Weak nos create false hope and waste everyone's time.
Good Strategy Bad Strategy by Richard Rumelt
Book on making clear strategic choices and trade-offs
5 Step 5: Create not-to-do list alongside to-do list
Step 5: Create not-to-do list alongside to-do list
Document opportunities explicitly declined and why. Not-to-do list: prevents re-litigating same decisions, communicates priorities to team, stops rejected ideas from resurging. Institutional memory is weak; writing creates permanence. When someone proposes previously-rejected idea, point to documented decision. Saves time and prevents decision fatigue. Clear nos stay no.
6 Step 6: Review trade-offs quarterly to ensure discipline
Step 6: Review trade-offs quarterly to ensure discipline
Discipline requires ongoing practice. Quarterly review: opportunities declined, whether decisions proved right, new opportunities requiring decisions. Celebrate good nos as much as good yeses. Recognize leaders who protected focus by declining attractive distractions. What gets measured and celebrated gets repeated. Make strategic discipline cultural value, not leader's burden.
The 4 Disciplines of Execution by McChesney
Framework for maintaining focus on wildly important goals